Tom Kelso, M.S., C.S.C.S.
I truly believe that many athletes at all levels are functioning day-to-day in an over-trained state. But it may not be that detectible because everything is relative. Place a group of idiots in a room, administer an I.Q. test, and one of them will out-score the others and look impressive even though still an idiot. Over-trained athletes competing against each other is the same: one will defeat another regardless of margin of victory yet the over-trained state will go unnoticed due to fact the ultimate goal of victory was accomplished.
The main culprits of this affliction are 1) the limited 5-day work week traditionally used to plan training, 2) the training components of strength training, sprinting, agilities, interval running, and/or sport practice sessions that need to be scheduled and 3) the pressure to win. All the lifting, running and practicing are crammed into the traditional 5-day workweek with the goal of out-preparing the next opponent. How is the body expected to recover from all of these stressors with the inadequate recovery time available in this period? The human body has both limited energy and recovery ability and must recuperate from not only one demanding training component but from multiple stressors, possibly on the same day or on adjacent training days (i.e., strength training and conditioning work). To really compound the issue, proper dietary intake and sleep are essential in the recovery process. But, unless you live on another planet other than I do, you know that athletes can fail miserably here. Many skip breakfast, have poor food selection when they do eat, and some frequently sleep only 6 to 7 hours each night. Add poor nutritional intake and inadequate sleep to a training week crammed with all forms of physically demanding/energy depleting activities and you have a real problem.
Let me offer a very interesting quote by Michael E. Houston in an article entitled, “Gaining Weight: The Scientific Basis of Increasing Skeletal Muscle Mass” from the Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 24(4):305-316:
“Adequate recovery between training sessions is extremely important since the effects of resistance training, especially with significant emphasis on eccentric muscle action, may persist for 5 days or more.”
Now, think about that. If it may take up to 5 days to recover from the stresses of a single strength training session (eccentric emphasis or not), what are we doing going back for more two or three days later if total recovery and consequent adaptation to previous demands has not yet occurred? To compound the issue, add energy-depleting conditioning work on non-lifting days and it can really lead to over training.
There is a biological time-line that must be followed for full recovery to occur. Take the example of receiving an incision on a finger from a sharp knife. The wound must be given time to fully heal. Do you think within 24 hours it will be fully healed? Absolutely not. Maybe at the 48-hour mark it will be starting to make good progress, but most likely not fully healed. It may take at least 72 to 96 hours to fully heal even with proper care and attention. Similarly, if physical training is resumed before the body is fully recovered, the potential adaptation to the previous workout may be cut short, yielding less-than-maximum results. The time-line for recovery can be facilitated somewhat by proper nutrition and good sleep habits, but even a minimum amount of time (multiple days) is mandated to even approach full recovery.
The point to stress here is if optimal adaptation and gains are desired, a specific biological time-line must be followed after completing any stressful training session. Interfering with this time-line with additional stresses and/or not allowing enough time for the healing process will limit desired results. Therefore, sport coaches and strength and conditioning coaches both need to understand the following when designing training programs or practice plans:
1. A properly performed strength-training workout should leave an athlete depleted and unable to maximally perform other activities, especially after a hard leg-strengthening session. In fact, the chances of becoming injured may increase when running-type activities are performed immediately following a demanding leg-strengthening workout. Depleted leg muscles from strength training are not capable of maximal contractions and may not withstand the extreme forces incurred when planting, turning, cutting, jumping and sprinting in practices or in conditioning sessions.
2. Similar to #1, any conditioning-type workout will leave the athlete fatigued and depleted, making the performance of subsequent work less than maximum. If one had to strength train the legs and condition on the same day, it would be better to run first then lift. However, the energy needed for the leg workout would naturally be less-than-maximum. I recommend avoiding any leg strength-training and running on the same day. If one had to, though, a better run/lift combination would be upper body strength training (no legs) and then conditioning. Lifting upper body prior to running would be less taxing and allow for a better quality conditioning session.
3. Energy is required to not only perform any workout or practice session,
but also to
recover from and adapt to it. If you perform one demanding
workout and then engage in a second demanding activity before full recovery has
occurred, the energy required to complete the recovery process for the first
workout will be used to fuel the second session. This can very easily delay
overall recovery and adaptation, thus leading to an over trained state.
4. As stated previously it may take a number of days to fully recover from a stressful training session. When developing training programs it is important then to balance the stresses of both strength training and conditioning with designated complete rest days.
What is the ultimate solution to the over training and recovery problem? First, scrap the traditional 5-day plan that does not account for recovery. If using a 5-day plan, be sure to schedule a complete day of rest, preferably mid-week (Wednesday). Secondly, implement a system that varies at least every two weeks using a different training format for each week. Finally, spread the training stresses over the established training period. Assure that adequate recovery occurs between each training session regardless of the particular day of the week. This may present realistic scheduling concerns, but with proper planning and scheduling it can be done. The key is to schedule exposures logically over a given period of time that allows enough recovery from one stress to the other. This will require a reduction of training sessions, but over an entire training period (i.e., 10 week out-of-season program) there will be enough exposures to produce measurable gains.
To provide actual examples of the aforementioned suggestions, let’s compare
traditional and non-traditional out-of-season training formats to show how
reduced volume and built-in recovery days need not create panic amongst the more
is better crowd. Examples 1 and 2 are traditional formats that include a high
number of exercise exposures, fewer recovery days and the potential to over
train. Examples 3 through 6 are typified by fewer exposures, more recovery days
and a lesser potential to over train. All of the following examples cover
10 weeks, or 70 days.
#1 Traditional 5-Day Plan
Strength
training - @ 4 day split routine
Conditioning - @ 2 days in weeks 1-5
and 3 days in weeks 6-10
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS
FRI SAT
1 to 5 OFF Lift
Upper Lift OFF Lift Upper
Lift OFF
Body &
Lower Body & Lower
Run
Body Run Body
6 to 10 OFF Lift Upper Lift OFF
Lift Upper Lift OFF
Body
& Lower Body & Lower
Run
Body Run Body
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 40
(upper body @ 20 and lower
body @ 20)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 25
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXERCISE
SESSIONS (run and lift): 65
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 25
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 45:25
#2 Traditional 5-Day Plan
Strength
training - @ 3 day full-body routine
Conditioning - @ 2 days in weeks
1-5 and 3 days in weeks 6-10
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS
FRI SAT
1 to 5 OFF
Lift Run Lift Run
Lift OFF
Full
Body Full Body Full Body
6 to 10 OFF Lift Run
Lift Run Lift OFF
Full Body Full
Body Full Body
& Run
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 30
(both upper body and lower
body together @ 30)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 25
TOTAL NUMBER OF
EXERCISE SESSIONS (run and lift): 55
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 20
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 50:20
#3 Non-Traditional 5-Day Plan
Strength
training - @ 2 day full-body routine
Conditioning - @ 2
days
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS
FRI SAT
1 to 10 OFF
Run Lift OFF Run
Lift OFF
Full
Body Full Body
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 20
(both upper body and lower
body together @ 20)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 20
TOTAL NUMBER OF
EXERCISE SESSIONS (run and lift): 40
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 30
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 40:30
#4 Non-Traditional 5-Day Plan
Strength
training - @ Alternating upper and lower body M-W-F
Conditioning - @
1 day/week on weeks with 2 lower body days
@
2 days/week on weeks with 2 upper body days
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS FRI
SAT
1,3,5,7,9 OFF Lift Upper OFF
Lift OFF Lift Upper OFF
Body & Run Lower
Body Body & Run
2,4,6,8,10 OFF Lift Lower OFF Lift
OFF Lift Lower OFF
Body Upper Body Body
& Run
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 30
(upper body @ 15 and lower
body @ 15)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 15
TOTAL NUMBER OF EXERCISE
SESSIONS (run and lift): 45
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 40
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 30:40
#5 Non-Traditional 5-Day Plan
Using a
M-->F format, alternating a full body strength training workout with a
conditioning workout with a full day of recovery after each
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS
FRI SAT
1,3,5,7,9 OFF Lift
Full OFF Run OFF Lift
Full OFF
Body
Body
2,4,6,8,10 OFF Run OFF Lift
Full OFF Run OFF
Body
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 15
(both upper body and lower
body together @ 15)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 15
TOTAL NUMBER OF
EXERCISE SESSIONS (run and lift): 30
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 40
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 30:40
#6 Non-Traditional 7-Day Plan
Using an
entire 7 day week alternating a full body strength training workout and a
conditioning workout with a full day of recovery after each
WEEKS SUN MON
TUES WED THURS
FRI SAT
1,5 & 9 Lift Full Body
OFF Run OFF Lift Full Body OFF
Run
2,6 & 10 OFF Lift Full Body OFF Run OFF Lift Full Body OFF
3 & 7 Run OFF Lift Full Body OFF Run OFF Lift Full Body
4 & 8 OFF Run OFF Lift Full Body OFF Run OFF
NUMBER OF STRENGTH TRAINING SESSIONS: 18
(both upper body and lower
body together @ 18)
NUMBER OF RUNNING SESSIONS: 17
TOTAL NUMBER OF
EXERCISE SESSIONS (run and lift): 35
NUMBER OF FULL RECOVERY DAYS (including
weekends): 35
RATIO OF ACTUAL WORK DAYS TO FULL RECOVERY DAYS: 35:35
PERSPECTIVE
We
know that to make muscles stronger or enhance cardio-respiratory fitness, an
overload to the system must be created. Overload simply means it must be forced
beyond its current capacity. Also keep in mind that progression is vital,
meaning that each succeeding workout in sequence needs to be systematically more
demanding. Finally, giving the body time to fully recover and heal from these
demanding overloads is critical. With this in mind, examine the previous
out-of-season examples in terms of the amount of work and amount of recovery
relative to the total number of exercise sessions within the 70-day period (both
energy-depleting strength training and conditioning). It should be quite
evident that the fewer number of exercise exposures performed, coupled with a
similar number of recovery days, would be the optimal choice.
To put this into perspective, imagine you were required to strength train HARD and condition HARD ten times each (20 energy-depleting sessions total) over a reasonable period of time. Undoubtedly, you could enhance your genetic potential if you trained progressively each of the ten sessions as long as you fully-recovered after each. Now, look at the number of strength training and conditioning exposures in the previous examples, the number of full recovery days, and the ratio of actual workdays to full recovery days as noted below:
FORMAT ACTUAL
FULL STRENGTH CONDITIONING
WORK
RECOVERY TRAINING EXPOSURES
DAYS
DAYS EXPOSURES
#1 –
Traditional 45 25
20 x upper 25
20 x lower
#2 – Traditional 50 20 30 x full-body 25
#3 - Non-traditional 40 30 20 x full-body 20
#4 - Non-traditional 30
40 15 x upper 15
15 x lower
#5 - Non-traditional 30 40 15 x full-body 15
#6 - Non-traditional 35 35 18 x full-body 17
If ten sessions of quality strength training and ten sessions of quality conditioning will result in good progress, imagine then the results possible with the number of exposures offered above the non-traditional training formats (3, 4, 5 and 6), especially coupled with a greater number of recovery days.
For example, in #4, 15 upper body and 15 lower body strength sessions are plenty of opportunity to induce strength gains in a single out-of-season period. Also, 15 conditioning sessions are more than adequate to increase cardio-respiratory fitness. Note that 40 complete rest days are scheduled here to facilitate recovery from the 30 actual training days making this a sound training plan.
Example #6 uses 18 full-body strength-training sessions and 17 conditioning sessions coupled with 35 complete rest days. Again, a more-than-adequate number of exercise exposures with plenty of built-in recovery time to allow for optimal adaptation.
Compare these to the traditional examples # 1 and #2. In #1 there are 20 upper body and 20 lower body strength sessions, 25 conditioning exposures, but only 25 complete rest days in the 70 day plan. Over training may be more likely here. Similarly – and possibly quite worse than #1 – example #2 is characterized by 30 full-body strength sessions, 25 conditioning workouts but only 20 complete rest days.
As you can see, more is not always better when it comes to physical
training. Properly planned overloads in the weight room and at the running
venue must be logically placed over a training period along with all-important
built-in recovery days. Train your athletes hard, but also train them
intelligently.